New Delhi: The Supreme Court has upheld Rajasthan’s rule disqualifying candidates with more than two children from government jobs. This ruling directly impacts individuals applying for government positions and serves as a significant step in promoting family planning policies.
Jurisdictional Authority:
The Supreme Court supported the Rajasthan High Court’s earlier judgment, stating that the rule falls within the state’s legislative authority and cannot be deemed unconstitutional. It highlighted that the rule’s objective of encouraging family planning aligns with the Constitution’s broader aspirations.
Court’s Statement:
The Supreme Court dismissed arguments that the rule is discriminatory or unfair, asserting that implementing such measures is within the state government’s prerogative. The bench, comprising Justices Surya Kant, Dipankar Datta, and K.V. Viswanathan, delivered this significant ruling.
Case Background:
The case arose from a petition filed by ex-serviceman Ramji Lal Jat. In 2018, Jat applied for a constable position in the Rajasthan Police but was disqualified under Rule 24(4) of the Rajasthan Police Subordinate Service Rules, 1989, as he had more than two children. He challenged the Rajasthan High Court’s ruling in the Supreme Court, which ultimately upheld the regulation.
Rajasthan’s regulation, introduced years ago, aims to promote family planning by limiting eligibility for government jobs to those with two or fewer children. The Supreme Court’s decision reinforces the state’s authority to implement such rules and underscores the importance of family planning as a public policy goal.READ THIS- Heavy Rain Alert for Several Districts in Karnataka Over the Next Two Weeks: IMD
This ruling could set a precedent for other states to adopt similar measures, strengthening the focus on sustainable population control in India.